Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2013No. 87343-7PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.

¶ 1 The city of Seattle (City) seeks review of an unpublished Court of Appeals decision affirming a $12.75 million verdict in favor of former Seattle firefighter Mark Jones. The City asserts that the trial court erred by (1) excluding three late-disclosed defense wit*327nesses without first conducting the inquiry required under Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wn.2d 484, 494, 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) and (2) denying the City’s motion to vacate the judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Although we find that the trial court erred in excluding testimony by the late-disclosed witnesses, we…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason ContractorsWashington Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re The Parenting & Support Of C.t.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Puget Sound Security Patrol, Inc. v. William Bates And Kathryn BatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API