Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 2006No. 76720-3PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
132 P.3d 115 (2006)
156 Wash.2d 677
Kurtis R. and Pamela MAYER, Petitioners,
v.
STO INDUSTRIES, INC., a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Washington, Respondent,
Marvin Windows, Inc., a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Washington; Northwest Tile, Inc., a Washington corporation; and McSweeney Steel Company, Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants.
No. 76720-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 14, 2006.
Decided April 6, 2006.
James Benjamin Meade, Forsberg & Umlauf, Margaret Yvonne Archer, Bradley Alan Maxa, Gordon Thomas Honeywell, Tacoma, for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Jones v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.