Department of Social & Health Services v. Parvin
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*111¶1 After a trial on the State’s petition for guardianship as to M.P., the trial court entered orders establishing the guardianship and dismissing the dependency as to M.P. The parents of M.P., Paul Parvin and Leslie Bramlett, appeal the trial court’s orders. Bramlett argues that the trial court erred when it excluded two defense witnesses without conducting a Burnet1 inquiry on the record. She argues, in the alternative, that her lawyer provided ineffective assistance when the lawyer failed to give proper notice of the excluded witnesses. Both parents also contest the trial court’s findings…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Foss Maritime Co. v. BrandewiedeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V April Jeanell HancockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Csilla Muhl, V Davies Pearson, P.c.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Foss Maritime Company, Res. v. Jeff Brandewiede, Jane Doe Brandewiede, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.