Foss Maritime Co. v. Brandewiede
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Verellen, A.C.J.
f 1 — Disqualification of counsel is a drastic sanction, to be imposed only in compelling circumstances because it “exacts a harsh penalty from the parties as well as punishing counsel.”1 The trial court here disqualified Jeff Brandewiede’s counsel for accessing and reviewing an opponent’s privileged communications. But the trial court failed to consider on the record the principles and guidelines of In re Firestorm 19912 and Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. Fisons Corp.3 regarding (1) prejudice, (2) counsel’s fault, (3) counsel’s knowledge of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Danelle M. Shay v. Thomas O. BaicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Foss Mar. Co. v. BrandewiedeWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Pamela J. Bridgen v. Windermere Real Estate Co., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Patty Hur v. Lloyd & Williams, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- R.o. And K.m. v. Medalist Holdings LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021