People v. Cimar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
The defendant was convicted of pandering in violation of the Statutes of 1911, page 9, 1 Deering’s General Laws of 1931, page 819, Act 1906. The information charges that he did “wilfully and unlawfully and feloniously procure for a female person ... a place as an inmate of a house of prostitution”.
The appellant contends the verdict is not supported by the evidence for the reason that the female in question was not procured to become an inmate of a house of prostitution against her will, but upon the contrary that she voluntarily entered and remained in the house. It is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. RoderigasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.