Legal Opinion

People v. Charles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1963No. Crim. 1852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

By Count One in an information, the defendants Charles, and a third person named Mary Swann, were charged with an attempt to commit the crime of pandering, i.e., an attempted violation of section 266i of the Penal Code; by Count Two therein, were charged with conspiracy to commit the crime of pandering, i.e., a violation of section 182 of that code; and by separate allegations therein, the defendant Louis Charles also was charged with a prior felony conviction. What disposition was made of the charges against Mary Swann does not appear. The defendant Louis Charles admitted the prior…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. People v. BenenatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. HashimotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API