Legal Opinion

People v. Montgomery

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1941No. Crim. 3420PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Both appellants herein, together with others named, were charged by an indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit pandering, a felony, (Stats. 1911, p. 9; Act 1906, p. 970, Deering’s General Laws 1937) with four counts of pandering and two counts of attempted pandering. Appellant Montgomery was convicted on all counts and appellant Forrester was convicted on three counts of pandering. Bach, appellant prosecutes a separate appeal from the respective judgments of conviction and from the orders denying appellants’ motions for a new trial. The evidence adduced at the trial establishes that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Joseph Moss v. Albert H. HornigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API