Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Courtney

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1959No. Crim. 6750PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFotjrt, J.

This is an appeal hy Russell Guy Courtney JErom a judgment wherein he was convicted of pimping and pandering and an appeal by Ardella M. Courtney from a judgment wherein she was convicted of pimping.

In an information filed in Los Angeles County, the defendants were charged with pimping and pandering in violation of sections 266h and 266i of the Penal Code. A jury found Ardella M. Courtney (hereinafter referred to as the woman appellant) guilty of pimping as charged in Count I and Russell Guy Courtney (hereinafter referred to as the man appellant) guilty of pimping and pandering as charged.

A…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Estate of CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. People v. NasworthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. HashimotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. FixlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API