People v. Burns
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
By an information containing two counts defendant was charged with the crime of pandering, as defined in the act of February 8, 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 9). A verdict of guilty upon each count was returned by the jury, and defendant now appeals from the judgments entered thereon and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The statute enumerates several separate, definite, and distinct acts, the commission of any one of which constitutes a specific offense, although each offense separately defined by the statute is included within the generic crime of pandering. By the information filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Abrams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
- People v. SalisburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ebert v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. CimarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. FrostAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
- People v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.