Legal Opinion
People v. Mitchell
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1949No. Crim. 4299PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Having been convicted of the crime of attempted pandering (Stats. 1911, p. 9; 1 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 1906 * ) defendant now demands a reversal of the judgment on the grounds that (1) the evidence is insufficient and (2) the time for pronouncing judgment was extended beyond the 30 days allowed by the Penal Code. (§ 1191 as amended, 1947; Stats. 1947, ch. 1178.)
The facts established are that Sergeant Stokes of the Los Angeles Police Department placed the residence of appellant in the western part of Los Angeles under observation from the first week in April to May 5, 1948. He watched it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. BenenatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. SeverinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.