Legal Opinion
Bridges v. Cal-Pacific Leasing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1971No. Civ. 36579PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
The instant controversy had its genesis in the purchase of certain equipment for a drive-in restaurant leased in April of 1963 by defendant and cross-defendant Time Oil Company (referred to hereinafter as “Time”) to Jo An and Hershel Maggard. By clause “D” of the lease, it was agreed that all improvements and fixtures would belong absor lutely to the landlord (Time) upon termination of the lease for breach of any of the covenants contained therein; further, it was expressly provided that default in any contract for the payment of fixtures or equipment would be deemed a breach…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- H & M ASSOCIATES v. City of El CentroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Inc. v. California Health Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Bob Hamro v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Doan v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Richardson v. La Rancherita of La Jolla, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.