Legal Opinion
Bob Hamro v. Shell Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1982No. 80-4257PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANBY, Circuit Judge.
Bob Hamro, a service station operator, appeals from a judgment dismissing his action against Shell Oil Company (Shell) for violations of California’s antitrust statutes and for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Shell on three statutory tie-in claims and on the claim of intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. At trial, the district court granted Shell’s motion for a directed verdict on the remaining statutory claim of price discrimination. We affirm.
Hamro operates…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Building, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Power Test Petroleum Distributors, Inc. v. Calcu Gas, Inc. And Yonkers Overpass Equities Corp., Yonkers Overpass Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Casco Marina Development, L.L.C. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.