Legal Opinion
Herron v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1961No. Sac. 7278PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Plaintiffs, attorneys at law, brought this action against Mr. and Mrs. Donald Halverson for breach of contract and against State Farm Mutual Insurance Company and its agent, Anthony Caruso, for intentional interference with contractual relations. The Halversons were not served, and a demurrer of State Farm and Caruso (who will be referred to as defendants) was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs have appealed from the ensuing judgment.
The following is a summary of plaintiffs’ allegations: The Halversons entered into a contingent fee contract with plaintiffs concerning claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.