H & M ASSOCIATES v. City of El Centro
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
Plaintiff H & M Associates appeals the judgment of dismissal entered after defendants’, City of El Centro and the members of the El Centro City Council, demurrer to its second amended complaint (complaint) was sustained without leave to amend. As we will explain, plaintiff, a limited partnership, has alleged facts sufficient to state causes of action for intentional interference with contractual relationships, invasion of privacy and conspiracy against the City of El Centro (City). We reverse the judgment.
*404 Factual and Procedural Background
H & M Associates, a limited…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Felsher v. University of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Pulver v. Avco Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.