Legal Opinion

Hendy v. Dinkerhoff

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,344PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Superior Court of the County of El Dorado. Williams, J.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action to recover the possession of a certain steam engine and boiler, or their value. The case comes up on the judgment roll, and from the findings it appears, that on the 19th of July, 1877, the plaintiff, being the owner, leased the property to one Lampson, for the period of two months from the 1st of August, 1877, the latter to pay for its use $283.25 on the 1st day of September, and a like sum on the 1st day of October, 1877, with the right on the part of Lampson to purchase the property from the plaintiff for one dollar, in the event he should keep all the covenants of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Voorhees v. . McGinnisNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Eaves v. EstesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. March v. McKoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Montana Electric Co. v. Northern Valley Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API