Legal Opinion

Imperial Ice Co. v. Rossier

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1941No. L. A. 16558PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

The California Consumers Company purchased from S. L. Coker an ice distributing business, inclusive of good will, located in territory comprising the city of Santa Monica and the former city of Sawtelle. In the purchase agreement Coker contracted as follows: “I do further agree in consideration of said purchase and in connection therewith, that I will not engage in the business of selling and or distributing ice, either directly or indirectly, in the above described territory so long as the purchasers, or anyone deriving title to the good will of said business from said purchasers, shall be…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Carlson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  4. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API