Cairns v. Haddock
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was to restrain defendant from obstructing a ditch which was being used by plaintiff in conducting water across defendant’s land from a natural watercourse known as Elk Bayou to a certain tract of land owned by plaintiff. In the complaint it was alleged, “That said plaintiff is now, and for more than six years last past has been, the owner and in the actual possession of that certain water ditch heading in and leading out of a certain natural water course situate in the County of Tulare, State of California, known as the Bayou, and the weirs and gates in and across said Bayou at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Flickinger v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Van Slyke v. Broadway InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooke v. RamponiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Rentfro v. DettwilerMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Ricioli v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Williams v. NeddoIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Clendenin v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.