Baldwin v. Temple
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
The plaintiff brought ejectment. The defendant answered, and also filed a cross-complaint to quiet title to the demanded premises, and plaintiff answered the cross-complaint. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. The findings were in favor of the defendant, and judgment was entered thereon. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment, and from the order denying a new trial.
No question is made that the plaintiff has the legal title, unless the defendant has acquired title by adverse possession; nor is there any question but that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Reynolds v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McDonald v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McGrath v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- De Arguello v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by24 opinions
- Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Knowles v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Strong v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Swann v. Sweetwater Irrigation & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.