Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Ramponi

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1952No. Sac. 6082PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment decreeing plaintiffs’ ownership of an easement over defendants’ land and enjoining defendants from interfering in any manner with plaintiffs’ use and enjoyment thereof. The propriety of this judgment is not open to dispute upon the application of equitable principles.

In 1937 plaintiffs purchased approximately 160 acres of land in Sonoma County from one Herbert Tracy. The only usable roadway permitting access to plaintiffs’ property from a public highway, the Lovell Valley Road, was a dirt and gravel road which crossed adjoining property then owned by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of L.A. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Adler v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Elliott v. City of Pacific GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Noronha v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API