Ricioli v. Lynch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiff had judgment and the defendants appeal.
The complaint alleges: “That for more than forty years last past continuously, the predecessors in interest of plaintiff and this plaintiff have been and are now the owners and entitled to the possession of an easement which is annexed and appurtenant to the lands of plaintiff of a road leading from the said lands of plaintiff across the lands of defendants and that the lands of the said defendants are subservient to the said way and easement, . . . [here follows a description of the road by courses and distances] and for more than forty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stepp v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Myers v. BervenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Miller and Lux v. Kern County Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Cooke v. RamponiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Wallace v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Shonafelt v. BusathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.