Legal Opinion

Van Slyke v. Broadway Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1897No. S. F. No. 542PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action to recover from defendant (a corporation), upon three several causes.of action, sums of money aggregating $1,596.65. Plaintiff had judgment for a balance of $1,309.73. Defendant appeals, and the cause comes up on the judgment-roll, without any bill of exceptions.

The whole contention arises over plaintiff’s third cause of action. It appears that defendant, the Broadway Insurance Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York, and engaged in the insurance business in California. Plaintiff was the general agent of defendant in the state of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Varney v. . DitmarsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. v. Citicorp North America, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2009
  4. Williamson v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API