Smith v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
The action was one to restrain the defendant from obstructing an alleyway and for a mandatory order requiring the removal of the obstructions placed therein by defendant. Findings and judgment for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The facts found by the court and supported by the uncontradicted evidence are: In 1886, one Safford was the owner of a tract of land in Los Angeles City; that thereafter he subdivided said tract into lots and sold the same to various parties, representing to each at the time of the sale that a strip of ground…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Prescott v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Curtis v. KastnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bernstein v. DodikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- McMorris v. PaganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.