Legal Opinion

Eidinger v. Sigwart

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1910No. Civ. No. 687PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of El Dorado County granting a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an appeal from the order granting the defendant a new trial.

The action was for the recovery of compensation for alleged personal services rendered by the plaintiff for the defendant’s intestate during the lifetime of the latter.

The complaint alleges, and the evidence shows, that the deceased, in the month of December, 1905, was stricken with paralysis, and that he continued to suffer from that malady until the date of his death, on the twenty-ninth day of July, 1908. It is averred' that the plaintiff, “at the special instance and request of the deceased,” performed “work, labor and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. American Type Founders' Co. v. PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. People v. DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. PetrosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. People v. PrudencioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Adjustment Department v. BrostromWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API