Legal Opinion

People v. Prudencio

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1928No. Docket No. 1455PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is an appeal by the People from an order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial. The grounds urged for reversal are that at the time the motion was granted the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear or determine the same, and that even though jurisdiction did exist to entertain the motion, the granting of the same constituted an abuse of discretion.

The facts are as follows: The defendant was charged with murder by an information alleging that he did “unlawfully, wilfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought kill and murder one Antonio Garcia.” He entered a plea of not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. KnutteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Newman v. Overland Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re LeviCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. PaysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. DillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API