Legal Opinion

People v. Driggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1931No. Docket No. 1142PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The defendant was charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder, in an information filed by the district attorney of the county of Butte. Upon the trial, a verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon, was returned by the jury. The defendant thereupon moved for a new trial, which was granted. From the order granting a new trial the People prosecute this appeal.

The argument of counsel directs our attention first to the fact that while twelve jurors were sworn to try this cause, one of the jurors became too ill to act,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & Cleaning WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. PetrosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Eidinger v. SigwartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. BernhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. PociaskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API