Springer v. Pacific Fruit Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant John Franzoia from an order granting plaintiffs a new trial after a jury had rendered a verdict in his favor in an action against him for damages for personal injuries.
This action was originally brought by plaintiffs against the Pacific Fruit Exchange, a corporation; the appellant John Franzoia and two fictitious defendants.
Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint, among other things: that “at the time of the accident, a Buick automobile owned by Pacific Fruit Exchange was in charge of S. J. Ritchie, an employee of said exchange, and was being…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Smith v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.