Legal Opinion

Springer v. Pacific Fruit Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1928No. Docket No. 3462PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant John Franzoia from an order granting plaintiffs a new trial after a jury had rendered a verdict in his favor in an action against him for damages for personal injuries.

This action was originally brought by plaintiffs against the Pacific Fruit Exchange, a corporation; the appellant John Franzoia and two fictitious defendants.

Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint, among other things: that “at the time of the accident, a Buick automobile owned by Pacific Fruit Exchange was in charge of S. J. Ritchie, an employee of said exchange, and was being…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Smith v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API