Legal Opinion

Adjustment Department v. Brostrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1942No. 28812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff in this action, Adjustment Department, Olympia Credit Bureau, Inc., a corporation, which is engaged in the collection business, instituted this action, as assignee of one Tom Bushey, against Norman and Aletha Brostrom, husband and wife, asking for judgment for $337.50, upon an account for labor and materials which it was alleged were furnished by Bushey to defendants. Paragraph three of the complaint reads as follows:

“Heretofore the defendants, Norman Brostrom and Aletha Brostrom, husband and wife, acting for themselves, each other and their marital community, became indebted to Tom…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kunselman v. Southern Pacific RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Eidinger v. SigwartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Dudley v. DuvalWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lawson v. SpragueWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Doran Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Schussler v. MatthiesenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Marcussen v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API