Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
A rehearing was granted in this case for consideration of a question not discussed in the Department opinion, namely, whether "telephone" is included within the meaning of "telegraph," as used in section 591 of the Penal Code. It appeared that in the criminal action the defendant was charged with cutting telegraph wires, while the facts without dispute disclosed that the wires which he cut were used as telephone wires. The importance of the consideration in the case at bar arises from the fact that if telephone wires are not within the purview of section 591 it would tend to show lack of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Iowa Union Telephone Co. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. BriteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Sunset Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.