Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 28, 1967No. 42692PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

The petition in this case is an ordinary action based on negligence against an alleged tortfeasor for damages arising out of a collision between two vehicles, and the only clues that the plaintiff, in the event of success, may rely on the judgment as a basis to collect for uninsured motorist coverage lie in the fact that the insurance company in its pleading acknowledges service of process, and sets forth other facts indicating potential liability. Examining the so-called special appearance and intervention of the insurance company in the light of the relief sought by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Wert v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Moss v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Lima v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Doe v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Beard v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API