State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebbrhardt, Judge.
We are met at the outset with the contention that State Farm, in its designated capacity as “nominal defendant,” was not authorized to file a demurrer to the petition for damages. As an abstract proposition we would think that a “nominal defendant” would have the right at least to challenge the authority of the plaintiff to so name it, whether the challenge came by way of demurrer or motion. The par ticular circumstances of this case affirm that right. The granting of the motion to purge would have the effect of eliminating State Farm as a party defendant as would also the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- John Doe v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Creteau v. Phoenix Assurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Wert v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. GirtmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Strickland v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Lima v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Christensen v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Rawlins Ex Rel. Rawlins v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.