Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Jiles

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1967No. 42249, 42250PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

In the case of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Brown, 114 Ga. App. 650 (152 SE2d 641), the right of an insurance company occupying a position analogous to that of the appellant here to intervene in these cases was decided. There this court said: “ Tntervenors pro interesse suo are not known in the ordinary common-law suits. Delaney v. Sheehan, 138 Ga. 510 (73 SE 632). The general rule at common law is, that persons who are not parties to a suit cannot file an intervention therein. Tanner v. Am. Nat. Bank, 145 Ga. 512 (89 SE 515). There are some exceptions to the general rule,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Wert v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Delaney v. SheehanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Walker v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API