Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Craig

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1963No. 8172PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Presiding Judge.

This is mandamus to require the trial judge to permit intervention.

Relator, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”), issued its policy of insurance to Arthur Allen (hereinafter referred to as “insured”), whereby (under Coverage III) State Farm agreed to pay all sums which insured “ * * * shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury sustained by the insured * * subject to the provision that “for the purposes of this coverage, determination…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Boughton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Levy v. American Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. Farmers Mutuals Automobile Insurance v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. Duggan v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API