Legal Opinion

Lima v. Chambers

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1982No. 17622PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

On this appeal we decide whether an automobile liability insurance carrier providing uninsured motorist coverage may intervene as of right as a party defendant in a tort action between its insured and an uninsured motorist tortfeasor. The trial court denied intervention; we reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. In July of 1977 plaintiff, Barbara Lima, was involved in an automobile collision with defendant Earl Chambers, an uninsured motorist. Lima brought a negligence action against Chambers, an answer was filed, and discovery ensued. Thereafter, Chambers’ attorney withdrew…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Wells v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Glover v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ellwein v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. In Re Marriage of GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Earle v. CobbKentucky Supreme Court · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API