Legal Opinion
Keel v. MFA Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1976No. 47211PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
This involves an appeal from a judgment of the trial court which permitted appellee to recover the proceeds of two insurance policies under the uninsured motorist endorsement for bodily injuries sustained in one accident based on a prior judgment obtained against the tort-feasor.
Robert T. Keel (Keel) was injured when the automobile he was driving was struck by a vehicle driven by an uninsured motorist. MFA insurance Company (MFA) had issued two policies to Keel which covered separate automobiles. Two separate premiums were paid. Keel sought to recover on both…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Buzzard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.