Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Glover
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 16, 1966No. 41867PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
1. The only question involved is whether the insurance company has a right to protect its constitutional right of due process by intervention or some method with a less technical name. The answer is in the construction of the uninsured motorists laws. Ga. L. 1963, p. 588 et seq., as amended by Ga. L. 1964, p. 306 et seq. (Code Ann. § 56-407.1). *820The answer lies in the following propositions: (1) The uninsured motorists law provides that the injured party's insurance company may defend an action against an unknown motorist. (2) It provides that a copy of petition and process…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Wert v. BurkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. GirtmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Laslie v. Gragg Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Wells v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.