Legal Opinion

City of Pasadena v. McAllaster

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12726PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as city attorney of the City of Pasadena, to institute condemnation proceedings pursuant to an order of April 28, 1927, of the board of directors of the petitioner, City of Pasadena, for the acquisition of property necessary to widen, improve, and extend Holly Street between Marengo Avenue and Grand Avenue and to widen Grand Avenue between Holly Street and Colorado Street in said city.

As a return to the alternative writ the respondent filed a general demurrer to the petition and also an answer setting forth…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. California Toll Bridge Authority v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. County of Los Angeles v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API