Legal Opinion

San Francisco Gas Co. v. Brickwedel

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1882No. 8,510PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Application for writ of mandamus to Henry Brickwedel, Auditor of the City and County of San Francisco, to compel him to audit certain demands for gas furnished to said city and county.

1Opinion of the Court

Ro'ss,'J.:

We think it clear that when the framers of the present Constitution said, as they did by Section 18 of Article xi. of that instrument, that “ no county, city, town, township, board of education, or school district shall incur any indebtedness or liability, in any manner or for any purpose, exceeding in any year the income and revenue provided for it for such year, without the assent of two thirds of the qualified electors thereof, voting at an election to be held for that purpose,” etc., they meant that no such indebtedness or liability should be incurred (except in the manner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API