In Re City and County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This application for a writ of mandate was presented to this court upon an agreed statement of facts. The petitioners purport to make the application under the provisions of sections 1138 to 1140, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure, which relate to the submission of controversies which might be the subject of a civil action to courts which would have jurisdiction of such action, upon an agreed statement of facts. It is not necessary to determine whether these sections of the code have application to the submission of causes to this court, since the facts' set forth in the application…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.