Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Byram
California Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1951No. L. A. 21734PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The controversy here presented concerns the validity of a contract for the construction of a court building in the county of Los Angeles. The selection of the site therefor was considered by this court in Simpson v. Hite, ante, p. 125 [222 P.2d 225].
The county owns real property situated in the city of Los Angeles, which has been selected for the erection of a court building. The Retirement Association of the county of Los Angeles which exists by virtue of statute (Gov. Code, § 31552) is governed by a retirement board of five persons (Gov. Code, § 31520) and its members comprise the employees…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rider v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BowmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- McClain v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.