Lewis v. Widber
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate to the treasurer of the City and County oí San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an original application here for a writ of mandate requiring the respondent, who is treasurer of the city and county of San Francisco, to pay an audited claim of petitioner for his salary as chief clerk in the office of registrar of voters, for the month of June, 1893.
The facts are that the office of petitioner was established, and his salary fixed at one hundred and fifty dollars per month, by a statute of the state legislature; that when, on August 3, 1893, he made demand on the respondent for the payment of his claim for salary for the month of June preceding, there was plenty of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Shaw v. StatlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Welch v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.