Doland v. Clark
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. J. W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This case was submitted upon a written stipulation as to the facts, and thereupon judgment was ordered and entered for plaintiff declaring the contracts set forth in the complaint void, and ordering that they be surrendered and canceled. This appeal is from the judgment.
On June 5, 1900, the city of Sacramento, through its board of trustees, entered into two certain contracts with appellant which may he considered together as to the legal questions involved. The first contract provided, in detail, for supplying the city of Sacramento with the “Gamewell system of automatic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. ArguelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- John Weston v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- San Francisco Gas Light Co. v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.