Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert D. STONEBURNER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0105909
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 2016No. A15-441PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (the Director) petitioned for disciplinary action against attorney Robert D. Stonebumer. The Di rector’s petition alleges that Stoneburner violated Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(d) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). We referred the matter to a referee and, following a hearing, the referee concluded that' Stoneburner’s conduct did not violate the rules and recommended that the Director’s petition be dismissed in its entirety. The Director disputes the referee’s conclusions and recommendation, arguing that…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against EskolaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re KlotzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Monaghen v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In Re Charges Of Unprofessional ConductSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard S. Langree, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0234229. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024