Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Eskola

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2017No. A16-0269PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Richard S. Eskola. The Director alleged that Eskola failed to maintain trust account books and records, made false statements to the Director, and mishandled and misappropriated client funds. We appointed a referee, who concluded *296that Eskola committed the alleged misconduct and recommended an indefinite suspension of at least 18 months. The sole issue before us is the appropriate discipline. We conclude that the appropriate sanction for Eskola’s…

3Cases cited37 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against NwaneriSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against BonnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. In re KlotzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against BulmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against UpinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API