Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Houge

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 2009No. A07-2332PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) petitions this court to take disciplinary action against Minnesota attorney Benjamín S. Houge for several acts of misconduct arising from Houge’s representation and employment of a client, X. The court-appointed referee found that Houge violated eight Rules of Professional Conduct by testifying falsely, submitting false evidence, failing to correct false testimony, making other false statements, assisting in violation of court orders, and failing to supervise a non-lawyer assistant. Houge denies misconduct and…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API