Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Gherity
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 2004No. C5-87-1684PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline case, we conclude that respondent David J. Gherity was not denied due process in the disciplinary proceedings and that the referee’s findings of fact, and the conclusions drawn from those findings, are not clearly erroneous and are supported by the evidence. We also conclude that the appropriate discipline is indefinite suspension from the practice of law with no right to apply for reinstatement for a period of five years from date of this decision.
On June 20, 2001, Gherity was convicted in Hennepin County District Court of fifth-degree assault and disorderly…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Disbarment of John D. GreathouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by34 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.