In Re Charges Of Unprofessional Conduct
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This case involves Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.4(c), which prohibits "knowingly disobey[ing] an obligation under the rules of a tribunal." The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) issued an attorney (Attorney) an admonition for failing to file a summary judgment motion response by the deadlines set forth in Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 115.03(b). Following an evidentiary hearing, a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (panel) affirmed the admonition, concluding that Attorney's conduct violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.4(c). Attorney appealed to our…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NathansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019