Legal Opinion
In re Klotz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 2018No. A16-1631PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
OPINION
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Adam William Klotz. The Director alleged that Klotz misappropriated client funds, commingled client and business funds, made false statements to the Director, failed to cooperate with the Director's investigation, failed to maintain trust account records, failed to diligently pursue client matters, failed to communicate with clients, made false statements to clients, and failed to safeguard and promptly refund an unearned retainer. We appointed a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Royce D. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kassius O. Benson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0266632. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against, Bradley J. Haddy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387503. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- In re Petition for Reinstatement of Adam W. Klotz, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0390925Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Royce D. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018