Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Fett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 2010No. A09-1862PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On September 29, 2009, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against Donald Fett, an attorney duly licensed to practice law in Minnesota, alleging that Fett violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.11 and 1.4(b)2 by advising a client to act in a manner contrary to the express terms of a Minnesota statutory short form power of attorney. After a hearing on the Director’s allegations, the referee we appointed found that Fett had committed professional misconduct and recommended that Fett be publicly reprimanded and placed on…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against BonnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against SwokowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API