Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 2011No. A10-1756PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM..

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) petitions our court to take disciplinary action against" respondent Jay Gerard Swokow-ski, a Minnesota lawyer. The Director alleges that Swokowski: (1) committed forgery and misappropriated client funds in violation of Rules 8.4(b) and (c) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC); (2) failed to notify clients of his suspension in violation of Rule 26, Rules of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and Rule 3.4(c), MRPC; (3) engaged in a pattern of neglecting client matters,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against VossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against TaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jesse David MATSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0389131Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API