Legal Opinion
Neihaus v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1977No. Civ. 16518PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, Acting P. J.
In this petition for a writ of mandate/prohibition, petitioner seeks to prevent the trial of a personal injury action now pending before the respondent superior court.
On August 30, 1974, real party in interest (Rachel) filed a complaint in respondent court in Sacramento for personal injuries allegedly arising out of an automobile collision occurring in the State of Nevada in December 1973. One of the defendants below (Neihaus) is the petitioner now before us, and is a resident of Nevada. Rachel is a resident of California who was riding in an automobile driven by a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In re ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Javorek v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Berard Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guedalia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Kriebel v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Roy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Terzich v. MedakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.